A Geography of Violence: How Settler Colonialism Is Reshaping the West Bank

Available data indicate that attacks in the West Bank are no longer merely a temporary escalation in the level of violence; rather, they have evolved into a systematic pattern reflecting the intersection of settler attacks with deeper structural transformations in the conflict. This escalation became particularly evident during the period coinciding with the war waged by the United States and Israel against Iran, as settlers sought to exploit the world’s preoccupation with that war and the decline in international attention to conditions in the West Bank. This trend is reinforced by three interrelated dynamics: the accelerated expansion of settler-colonial activity, the declining effectiveness of legal accountability mechanisms, and the reduced level of international attention resulting from major powers’ engagement in other regional crises, thereby allowing a broader margin for the intensification and continuation of these attacks.

Reports by international and local actors, including OCHA, the human rights organization Al-Baydar, and others, indicate that settler violence has become a recurrent phenomenon of a cumulative nature, with thousands of attacks recorded against Palestinian civilians in recent years and a marked increase since 2023. In 2025 alone, approximately 5,890 attacks were documented, reflecting an unprecedented acceleration. The nature of these attacks has also undergone a qualitative shift: they are no longer confined to limited confrontations, but now include direct physical assaults, shootings, destruction of property, and the displacement of communities—indicating efforts to reshape the demographic reality on the ground in favour of the Israeli occupation. These attacks occur within an environment characterised by the absence of effective deterrence, where the majority of investigations conclude without accountability, thereby reinforcing a climate of impunity. This is further compounded by indications of Israeli leniency or complicity, involving both the military and governmental leadership, in relation to settler groups. These dynamics intersect with the expansion of settlement outposts, increasing friction and driving patterns of forced displacement. At the international level, the decline in political pressure—particularly during periods of regional tension—has contributed to widening the scope of these practices, rendering violence a tool for reshaping geography and demography and increasing the likelihood of its persistence.

At the humanitarian level, these developments have produced a profound transformation in the daily lives of Palestinians. Violence is no longer manifested as isolated incidents; rather, it has become a comprehensive system of pressure affecting all aspects of life. In terms of personal security, attacks involving shootings, arson, and physical assaults are increasing, at times targeting entire families, thereby reinforcing a pervasive sense of the absence of legal protection and rendering violence a near-daily reality. Movement is subject to severe restrictions through the proliferation of checkpoints and the closure of village entrances, effectively reshaping the functional geography of the West Bank and rendering mobility both complex and hazardous. This has led to social and economic fragmentation among Palestinian communities. Economically, pressures are intensifying as a result of land confiscation, denial of access to land, destruction of crops, and livestock theft, in addition to restrictions on employment and movement, thereby pushing the economy toward a “survival economy.” The destruction of property further exacerbates the financial burdens borne by households. In the services sector, checkpoints obstruct ambulance access and weaken emergency response capacities in the context of limited infrastructure, thereby increasing health risks. Overall, this reality reflects a gradual erosion of the foundations of daily life and compels the population to adopt forced coping mechanisms in the absence of prospects for near-term improvement.

Politically, these dynamics reflect a gradual erosion in the viability of the two-state solution, not only as a theoretical framework but also as a practical option. The expansion of settlements and the escalation of settler violence are reshaping the geographic configuration of the West Bank, which is increasingly fragmented into isolated “cantons” as a result of checkpoints, bypass roads, and settlement outposts. This fragmentation is accompanied by increasing waves of displacement, thereby undermining the territorial contiguity required for the establishment of a cohesive Palestinian state. In parallel, there are indications of a deeper structural shift toward a “one unequal state” reality, in which settler violence intersects with the existing governing structure, in the context of implicit coordination, the arming of settler groups, and their incorporation into semi-formal frameworks. This transformation consolidates a more entrenched system of control and weakens the assumption of the existence of two distinct parties capable of engaging in negotiations, thereby reducing the prospects for a return to a conventional negotiation process. At the international level, the preoccupation of major powers with other crises contributes to a decline in effective political pressure, despite the continued rhetorical support for the two-state solution, thereby widening the gap between declared positions and actual capacity to influence developments. Consequently, the two-state solution is not eliminated through a sudden political decision; rather, it is undergoing a process of gradual erosion that may ultimately render it impracticable.

From a legal perspective, forced displacement emerges as one of the most critical issues. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the transfer of populations under occupation, whether carried out directly or through the imposition of coercive conditions that compel them to leave. When this legal framework is applied to the situation on the ground, a recurring pattern of displacement becomes evident, driven by violence, settlement expansion, and the destruction of homes, thereby creating an environment that is uninhabitable and forcing thousands of Palestinians to leave. International reports indicate that this pattern may amount to “forcible transfer,” and, in certain cases, may reach more severe legal characterisations if it expands in scope, particularly when accompanied by the resettlement of other groups in the same areas. The legal classification of these practices depends on their scale, systematic nature, and their linkage to the occupying authorities. Where these elements are established, such acts may be classified as war crimes under international humanitarian law and may rise to the level of crimes against humanity if they are found to constitute part of a broader policy targeting a specific population group. Human rights organisations have also indicated that some of these acts may fall within the category of “grave breaches” of international humanitarian law.

In conclusion, these developments reveal a complex and multidimensional reality in which humanitarian, political, and legal dimensions are deeply intertwined. The West Bank is increasingly moving toward an unstable environment characterised by the gradual erosion of the foundations of life. At the humanitarian level, the sense of insecurity is intensifying and living conditions are deteriorating; at the political level, the horizon for negotiated solutions is receding in favour of an entrenched and unequal reality; and at the legal level, indicators of serious violations are increasing, potentially warranting international accountability.